All posts by Madeline Hinderstein

Unit 3 Reflection

Unit 3 Reflection

  1. I think my title is incredible intriguing. It grabs the attention of the reader because it addresses not only sexual assault on college campuses, but it introduces the idea that college athletes are considered celebrities.
  2. The first part of the article talks briefly about how college athletes are viewed by ‘regular’ students including myself. I think, even though it may have been taboo, it was important to include my own opinion because I go to a school where both our men’s and women’s basketball teams made it to the final four of this year’s March Madness. I also briefly begin to explain a very well known sexual assault case that the media has covered for roughly three years.
  3. I offered up a rather strong idea within the first few paragraphs of my article. However, I don’t think it necessarily requires a large amount of analysis to support or evolve it.
  4. I showed organization throughout my piece by starting out broad and describing the reputation of college athletes on campuses. I then went into a rather detailed and lengthy description of a well-known sexual assault case against FSU quarterback Jameis Winston. Additionally, I used examples from as far back as 50 years ago.
  5. I think I wrote in a broad enough sense that a large portion of the general population can understand it, but I didn’t compromise it by making it too broad and making it seem like a casual issue. The sequence of which I described the athletes, actual cases, and what can be done all flowed really well together.
  6. The extensive research I did definitely showed throughout the article. I used sources like USA Today and Huffington Post, which are more secondary sources. I used a police deposition as a primary source because it was released directly from the Tallahassee Police Department. It has direct quotes from the officer that was helping with the case saying that he could have done more to help the victim, Erica.
  7. I met all of the requirements and a list of my sources is available at the bottom of my article along with hyperlinks after direct quotations.
  8. I wove the primary and secondary sources effectively throughout the piece. I was able to use a lot of information from more than half of them because they were full of it. The legitimacy of my primary source is very serious and official and it makes a good impression on the reader that I did my extensive research.
  9. I used a sense of emotion in my piece by using direct quotes and my own personal opinions about the topic. I used strong words to convey what I was feeling and I think that that showed.
  10. I only chose to use one visual because I didn’t think more than one was necessary. It’s just a silhouette of violence and I think it’s simplicity represents how simple this issue can start out as, but gets escalated with reputations and too many people being involved.
  11. I wasn’t able to be present for a lot of the peer editing sessions we had, so I went about my own editing process from different perspectives; how would a parent read this? How would a college student read this? How would an educator read this? This really helped me get into different mindsets of what a viewer wants to hear.
  12. I used them rather affectively. If I directly quoted something I put it afterwards in parentheses.
  13. Since I edited so many times, I do feel that my attention to grammar and style of the writing was taken very seriously.

New York Times Magazine Article

The Other Side of the Coin: How Rape Victims Are Treated When a “Celebrity” is Involved~ Maddie Hinderstein

College athletes. Talented, worshiped, god-like. “Greatness is respected, rejoiced, revered,” (Rob Lowe, I Hate Christian Laettner Documentary).

When I watch Malachi Richardson score 23 points in a single half against a number 1 seed school and then see him come into my lecture hall two days later it makes your heart skip a beat a little. Being around someone with his talent is intimidating and therefore implies some form of respect.

They’re names are known nationally, their skills are envied by thousands, and yet they sometimes can seem like regular people, but we know that they’re anything but that.

After winning the Heisman Trophy in 2013, being the first overall pick in the 2015 NFL draft, and casually being accused of rape, it’s safe to say that if you don’t know who Jameis Winston is, it’s time to escape from the rock your living under.

A legend in the Florida State University football world and a rookie starting quarterback of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, the young 22 year old has been under the microscope of the public eye since rape allegations were reported against him in late 2012 to the Tallahassee Police Department (TPD).

After going to the TPD the accuser, Erica Kinsman, was encouraged not to press chargers because the city is “a big football town” and she wouldn’t be treated well if she brought the allegations forward. This did indeed happen; many Seminoles fans stopped talking to her and thought that one of their rival teams had put her up to it (Murphy). Could you imagine someone telling you that your safety and your truth isn’t 1) important in general and 2) isn’t important enough to risk someone’s career.

In November of 2013, one year after the allegations were first reported, the State Attorney of the Second Judicial Circuit took over the investigation because it became public. On December 5, 2013, State Attorney Willie Meggs announced that the investigation was completed and nobody would be charged.

From spring 2014 to the end of 2015 more reports of police shortcomings were revealed. This time they weren’t morally wrong or hateful towards a specific person, they were just things that could and should have been done but weren’t. Tallahassee police officer Scott Angulo was assigned to the case right after the alleged assault. In December of 2015 the 199-page deposition was released to USA TODAY Sports and many of Angulo’s mistakes were revealed. He never spoke to the Florida State police officer that first responded to Erica, he never tried to get any sort of surveillance from Potbelly’s nor did he speak to any of its employees or eyewitnesses from the scene (Axon). He had physical descriptions of Winston, yet he never asked anyone if he was seen that night at Potbelly’s. It’s not like he’s Joe-Schmo, this is a 6’ 4’’, 231 lb. worshiped football player who 9 times out of 10 could have been pointed out in that bar.

The official FSU hearing was on December 21, 2014, and Winston was cleared of his allegation on sexual assault. Part of Florida Supreme Court Justice Major B. Harding’s decision is below.

 

I do not find the credibility of one story substantially stronger than that of    the other. Both have their own strengths and weaknesses. I cannot find with             any confidence that the events as set forth by you, (accuser), or a particular    combination thereof is more probable than not as required to find you             responsible for a violation of the Code. Therein lies the determinative factor of my decision (Wikipedia).

 

Following the hearing, Erica Kinsman filed a civil suit against Winston and he countersued her for tortious interference. Erica also sued Florida State University in a Title IX lawsuit, but in January of 2016 they reached of settlement of $950,000 to “…avoid millions of dollars in legal expenses,” according to university president James Thrasher (CNN).

Although she has left the university, she is happy to see that FSU is trying to fix the culture around rape and sexual assault on college campuses. Prevention tasks forces are being made, hiring interpersonal violence experts, and publishing victims’ rights handbook are some of the few things being done around the campus.

armyshadow

So you’re probably wondering why this matters. Maybe your school doesn’t have a large athletics program; maybe they aren’t D1 or D2. Maybe you go to a small art school where the words ‘sports’ or ‘athletics’ are even uttered. I promise you, this matters.

My summary of the Jameis Winston trial may just seem like a typical summary, but the most important points were probably overlooked by at least 60% of you readers.

The errors in this case stick out like a damn sore thumb. The fact that the Tallahassee Police Department, the Florida State University student body, the athletic department, and the university board were treating Erica poorly is unacceptable. I couldn’t imagine being told by a police officer, someone who is supposed to protect you and keep you safe, had the audacity to tell a young woman that her safety wasn’t important enough to ruin someone’s reputation.

More instances like that have happened at many other schools throughout the last 50 years. In 1976 at the University of Notre Dame a witness to an assault done by three football players was told to, “…shut up and mind their own business.” In 1994 at Virginia Tech Christy Brzonkala was raped by two football players. The chargers were dropped after one player threatened to sue the school for poor specific conduct on sexual assault. The other player was to be suspended for a year, but his suspension was lifted right before the next football season started. Brzonkala was publically scolded and shamed by a campus spokeswoman (Murphy). The University of Tulsa allegedly failed to protect a student from one of its men’s basketball players, “who had a history of sexual assault allegations,” (Fagan). And more recently, the University of Connecticut settled a $1.3 million federal lawsuit with five women who got indifferent responses from the school about their claims of sexual assault. Even though they settled, they didn’t admit to doing anything wrong. Most of the money went to a former women’s hockey player “who alleged that she had been kicked off the team after accusing a male hockey player of rape in August 2011,” (Fagan).

It’s really unfortunate that I could continue literally for pages upon pages of more of these stories.

So why pick on athletes? A lot of people like me can look back at high school and remember their quarterback as someone who ‘floats on air’ and can ‘do no wrong’. Everything just seems easier for them. If they aren’t naturally great students, teachers are okay with giving some them leniency because of their crazy schedules. They seemingly walk on a cloud that is just a little bit higher than everyone elses. Athletes, big or small school, know what it’s like to have people look up to them because they’re responsible for protecting a team and school’s reputation (PACT5). Sports bring an insanely large amount of money to schools, in-turn “coaches and school officials tend to be more protective of athletes than of other students,” (PACT5). We love these athletes and worship them so much because they do something that we can’t do and they do a damn good job at it.

But just because they’re great at what they do, doesn’t mean they shouldn’t have to pay for their wrongdoings. At the end of the day, they’re still students of the university, they’re still people in the area, and they’re still your fellow peers in the classroom. A victim shouldn’t feel uncomfortable when walking around campus. Your campus is your home and that is the last place that anyone should question their safety.

It’s important for entire student bodies to know that this is an issue concerning everyone. It’s a statistic that’s been said many times and people are “tired” of hearing it, but 1 in 5 women on a college campus are sexually assaulted. At Syracuse University that is 3,000 women. There are many schools in this country that don’t even have that many students total. Just because it’s not being reported in the media or it’s not what everyone on campus is talking about, doesn’t mean that it’s not a pressing issue.

Silence is wrong and it shouldn’t be encouraged. Shaming a victim for something that they didn’t do is wrong. Student protection on campuses isn’t equal and that’s not fair. Programs like Syracuse’s own advocacy center, R.A.P.E., shouldn’t be secretly shut down with no reasoning behind it and with no student input behind it (Tobin). The counseling center would simply brush up on their skills to handle the load they’d be getting from sexual assault cases. Campuses across the country deserve to have centers that a devoted specifically to sexual assault. It is obviously a bigger issue than people think and more attention needs to be given to it.

Personally, I think college campus sexual assault cases, whether they involve athletes or not, should be taken straight to the town’s or county’s police department. School police officers or security possibly have a bias towards the school and they know us and know our faces as happy students. When cases are handled by the universities themselves they worry about the university first and the victim second.

Nobody deserves to be shamed for speaking his or her truth. Victim treatment in sexual assault cases needs to change and everyone’s help is needed to make that change.

Sources:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/25/us/florida-state-fsu-settles-jameis-winston-rape-lawsuit/

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jameis_Winston#Controversies

 

http://deadspin.com/tallahassee-police-finally-admit-problems-with-investig-1746446618

 

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/2015/12/04/jameis-winston-investigation-rape-accusation-police-officer-scott-angulo/76808374/

 

http://espn.go.com/espnw/news-commentary/article/11386174/why-athletic-departments-clueless-handling-sexual-assaults

 

http://www.motherjones.com/media/2013/12/college-football-sexual-assualt-jameis-winston

 

http://pact5.org/resources/prevention-and-readiness/athletes-and-sexual-assault/

 

http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2014/09/syracuse_university_students_angry_about_closing_of_sexual_assault_advocacy_cent.html

 

http://espn.go.com/30for30/film?page=ihatechristianlaettner

Unit 1 Final

“Trust is a Must”- Maddie Hinderstein

Producers and consumers are in need of some serious couples therapy.

When we put food into our mouths, our initial reaction is “I can’t wait to eat this!” It’s not like we think, “Hmm, I wonder what cow this hamburger came from?” But in that lies the problem. We shouldn’t have to question it because we should know where our food comes from right down to the cow.

Since we’re starting with the animal itself we have to go a little lower on the food chain to what the animals are eating. All farms are different, so there isn’t one overall way that they’re supposed to feed their animals. According to, “You are what they eat” by Consumer Reports 10-30% of animals diets are unknown. Cattle are allowed to eat processed feathers for protein and chickens can have meat and bone meal.

By doing this they fatten the animals quickly and cheaply. In addition to those tasty treats, animals are constantly being injected with steroids and other hormones to make their meet more profitable. I don’t know about anyone else, but personally I’d rather not be eating steroids and bones for dinner.

Even though those animals are most likely forced to eat the bones and take the steroids, there are industries where we can’t always control what the animals are putting in their bodies. Our seafood industry in huge especially because we import 80% of it, but the FDA only tests 2% of the imports for drug residues. Salmon and tuna are two of the biggest fish that we eat. Since there at the top of the food chain they eat everything that there prey has eaten. By the time that all of the toxins and chemicals build up and then get to us, it’s a disgusting amount of bad things to be putting in our body.

We shouldn’t be eating blindly and that’s what this author is trying to say. We should be able to know more about where our food is coming from, what the animals are eating, and in the long run what are we going to be putting into our bodies. Since many people eat from large conglomerate companies, it’s important for their reputation that the customers are confident in their products.

The author makes it very clear that there are dangers in the fact that consumers don’t know where their food is coming from or what it’s consuming. The only negative about this author is that it gives both sides of the story. I understand that that is what makes a good piece of writing, but since it’s coming from the perspective of the consumer it should be highlighting the problems and the ways that they can be improved.

There are many differences between different consumers and different producers. A big difference between producers is whether a business is small or large. Small businesses, like farmers markets, rely on loyal customers with good relationships. Large businesses have a huge base of customers and they don’t pay attention to whether or not someone starts using their products.

Another large difference is between the customers themselves. There are some people who have the luxury of being able to buy high end ingredients that are healthy and organic, but some people have to buy discounted things and don’t have the opportunity to properly nourish themselves or their families. Some people don’t really have the ability to choose what they eat. They have to just deal with what they’re given and that’s unfortunate because there are probably lower-class families that want to be healthy and be nourished and don’t have the ability to do so.

Although its thought to be “the way of the future” or “the only way to have a healthy lifestyle”, there are many secrets behind the organic industry that its consumers don’t know about. According to “Organic Illusions” by Blake Hurst, the organic industry isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. Even though the industry itself is expanding, organic food sales only make up, “4% of the dollar value of all foods sold,” (Hurst). With his witty and sarcastic tone, Blake Hurst is able to connect with readers and make them see that not everything is so black vs. white in the food industry.

Companies can lose customers by the buzz that’s created about them, but if they prevent the buzz then nothing gets lost. That didn’t matter for one family featured in Food Inc., a documentary focusing on “America’s corporate controlled food industry. When a family was asked to be interviewed for the movie, they didn’t hesitate because they wanted to get their story out to public so that they could know the truth. The film captures the heartbreak and the struggles extremely well and has the ability to make viewers really feel something.

Barbara Kowalcyk is a food safety advocate and when her son, Kevin, was only 2 years old, he ate some bad meat and was stricken with E. coli 0157:H7. Within a matter of 12 days he was dead. She explains throughout her segment in the movie that she had a bill made, Kevin’s Law, that would give back to the USDA the power to shut down plants that repeatedly produced contaminated meat. President Obama eventually passed the law in 2011, but that was six years after the bill was introduced. And before the law even had to be made, the company the produced the meat tried suing the USDA because ‘they didn’t have the authority to shut down the meat plants.’

Barbara said that all she wanted was an apology from the company for the loss of her son, but she didn’t even get that. She just wanted to feel protected and she didn’t get that either. No matter how much power we think we have, it may never be enough to stand up against big companies. It’s sad to think that the death of someone’s child didn’t even make the company feel sorry for that poor family. It goes to show how screwed up the system is, just because you’re big and mighty doesn’t mean you get to step all over people.

As humans, we’re programmed to want to know things. The absence of knowing leads to suspicion, worry, and lack of trust, which is exactly what people, are feeling towards many companies. According to, “Consumers Want Food Companies to Pull Back the Curtain,” by Charlie Arnot the only way to earn a consumer’s trust is through transparency. Companies have to be honest with their customers and if they’re not honest it’s because they’re trying to hide something. This source had an excellent view from a passionate consumer that wanted to be part of the conversation with producing companies. They want there to be a good relationship between producer and consumer so that loyalty never has to be compromised or questioned.

Another thing that a lot of companies hide is their information on illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths. According to “The Politics of Foodborne Illness” in 1999 there were millions of illnesses, thousands of hospitalizations, and hundreds of deaths due to foodborne illnesses. One of the worst parts about this is that the chart in the article only lists the best-known pathogens that cause foodborne illnesses. There are so many more bacteria or other things that could be causing the illnesses the consumers don’t know about.

It’s unfair that the consumers and the victims of the illnesses aren’t even aware of why they’re becoming sick. It’s pretty sick and twisted that the relationship between the consumer and the producer isn’t strong. It’s unfair that consumers have to suffer and producers can just slide underneath the cracks like nothing has happened. Consumers need to have a voice in the conversation!

With the chart, the article is able to inform the readers of the statistics that stand. It’s one thing to hear about an illness or a death in the news, but to know that the numbers are so large is another thing.

Trust is a must. It’s crucial for any functioning relationship even if it’s such a large relationship in the food industry. For it to succeed, it needs work and effort from both sides. Consumers need to trust, but producers need to give them a reason to trust. There needs to be constant communication and equal communication from both sides or else the relationship will fail and the food industry will collapse.

 

Unit 1 Reflection

To me, a writer’s “project” is a culmination of a few things. The most important thing about a project is the point that one trying to get across to the readers and what is trying to be proven. The more secondary things are the types of genres one uses, the tones, the word choice and other things that help support the point that is trying to be made. For my blog, my project is that consumers need to be able to trust producers that are giving them food.

Especially since I got a late start on the project, the “Sorting it Out” workshop was a life saver for me. It helped me organize my thoughts in a really concise way and helped me figure out what message I wanted to get across.

Synthesis is crucial when reading something because you want to be able to grasp the meaning that the author was putting into their writing. The point of synthesizing is to figure out what the author meant and why they said something. They wouldn’t have said it if it didn’t have importance.

This unit I was able to become confident in my writing again. When I took WRT 105 last semester I wasn’t confident in my work and that made me want to share less and it didn’t make me want to be honest in my work. I usually just faked it til I made it and I now understand that that’s not the way to succeed.

From the beginning this was going to be my main idea. I know it sounds like I made no improvements on it but that’s what it is. For a while now I’ve been very passionate about my main idea the issue behind it and I knew from the beginning that this was what I wanted to do.

I started with talking about examples from each of the sources I used. I then synthesized them and gave my opinions. Then I talked about the article itself, meaning the aesthetics of it like the tone and word choices.

Throughout the blog I talk about each of my articles and the authors projects. I go into detail about their tones and how they come across to the readers.

Originally my lead was very long and choppy and it didn’t seem like it was going anywhere. Since I started my project so late I really just sat down and started writing and I never really had a traditional first draft. But when I was reading over my lede to make sure it made sense, I didn’t. So I looked at other leads on Huffington Post and I was able to get some inspiration.

I’d like to learn how to revise better on my own. I usually rely on others for revisions and I’d like to learn how to use myself as a resource and no depend on other people.