The main issue in food the food industry today is not whether we should buy organic or conventionally grown foods, but what type of production is best for the future generations to come and how the food we consume will determine the values and industries our country supports.
In the food industry production has become dependent on GMOs in agriculture and on antibiotics and other drugs in meat producing. Now, every time a problem occurs the solution is to invest in better technologies and genetics for food production, rather than resorting to more natural method. It seems that every time something goes wrong, more people go into a lab.
Throughout the past couple of decades there have been many concerns in the food industry. Consumers have become aware of the treatment and drugs given to the animals that they consume. There has not only been concern in the meat producing section of the food industry, but also in crop production. Farmers are beginning to mainly grow plants that have been genetically modified. This concern stems from people not knowing how these more recent styles of food production affect their health.
In many cases the food industry is abusing the power to produce food. Much of this industry is focused solely on profit and will obtain by making production as cheap as possible, while abiding by all the regulations. Many consumer would think as long as they follow regulations everything will be fine, but what consumers do not know is how loose the regulations and how they are barely being enforced.
Marion Nestle, a professor in the department of Nutrition, Food Studies, and Public Health at NYU, once explained that food producers do not have to recall unsafe foods, but they do because the want the consumer to feel safe buying their product. <http//blackboard.syr.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-3960364-dt-content-rid-11963839_1/courses/32056.1162/Nestle%20Resisting%20Food%20Safety.pdf > . She connects this with the lack of regulation enactment and enforcement in the FDA and USDA. These government organizations are supposed to be protecting the consumer, but as the film Food Inc. demonstrated many of the officials appointed to these organizations have been linked to major establishments in the food industry as well as congress. As a government agency created to protect this country from hazardous food, all they have been successful of is maintaining the industries safety.
Some of the regulations in affect today have only helped the food system become stronger. For instance, in meat production the products that are approved to be used in animal feed have grown. According to the article “You are What They Eat” ,<https://blackboard.syr.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-3960322-dt-content-rid-11963838_1/courses/32056.1162/Consumer%20Reports%20You%20are%20what%20they%20eat.pdf>, the industry is now allowed to use animal waste, protein products, meat, bone, and blood. These are only ingredients that can be added to animal feed. This does not only seem disgusting, but it is also allowing animals that have been deemed insufficient for human consumption to be used in creating products for animals which will eventually be consumed by the population. By doing this the industry is able to reuse animal parts in order to cut costs.
The changes in the animal feed are harmful for the animal’s diet. Today, more animals have been taken off their natural diets and instead have been given feed. The film Food Inc. demonstrated how this could be a problem, but what I find most concerning is that in some cases this new diet can be linked to increases in harmful bacteria. Due to the rising outbreaks recently, any link should be further analyzed.
Many food producers do not only modify the animals’ diet from grass to make production cheaper, but they also administer drugs and antibiotics to create larger animals and to protect against disease. When these companies administer these drugs, they are creating alterations within the way these animals grow. For instance chickens have been given drugs to increase their size and to decrease the amount of time they take to grow. The documentary Food Inc. demonstrated how chickens were dying prematurely and how many of them could not move due to the increase in body size. This is not the only problem. Also, chickens are being given antibiotics in their feed. This is causing them to become resistant to antibiotics and this could make consuming something as common as chicken dangerous for the population. Although many producers and government program swear that everything is safe, consumers still have to question which type of diet they want the animals they eat to have. We have to realize that everything eaten and administered to animals will be carried into our diets when we consume them.
The argument presented so far makes it seem like there is a clear choice as to which foods should be consumed, but the real answer is much more complicated. Over the years the food system has been developed because many people believe it is more “sustainable”. People focus on whether our society is “sustainable” because they want future generations to grow up healthy without any worries of food borne illness. “Sustainability” is a way of producing a society that can be prosperous and be long-lasting.
“Sustainable” is a funny word that has a variety of meanings, especially when it is applied to the food system. We need to work for a “sustainable” future or we need a “sustainable” of farming that will produce enough food for the country. It seems like everyone is searching for their own form of sustainable and this is where the argument over food production can get difficult.
One view which can be represented by sources such as Food Inc., “You are What They Eat”, and “Resisting Food Safety”. These articles offer that the word “sustainable” when being discussed with the current food system is based on creating food that will not demolish the societies overall health. This focuses in on the issues of administering drugs to meat, raising animals in warehouses, and using genetically modified plants. They are right in the fact that each of these factors has repercussions on society. The main concern with the word “sustainable” in this context is that people will become resistant to antibiotics and outbreaks of various bacteria will occur. This is a major concern with the increase in outbreaks related to food borne illnesses lately.
The other main definition for “sustainable” in this context can be represented by the article “Organic Illusions”. <https://www.aei.org/publication/organic-illusions/>. This article offers the idea of “sustainable” as being able to support thousands of people on the current food system. This article’s approach suggests that without the mass production that is offered by the current food system, society would not be able to have enough food to survive because there is not enough resources to run an organic food system on this large of a scale. This form of “sustainability” is being formed to protect a society from running out of a food supply.
The word “sustainability” used in different contexts can create a more controversial argument about food politics. There is no easy solution that can be made, but there is common ground that can be acquired on both sides of the issue.
The website Sustainable Table demonstrates how people and society can maintain a sustainable society in agriculture and production of meat. <http://www.sustainabletable.org/940/food-issues>. It represents different articles which explain how each part of the industry can become more sustainable and healthy. However, the only issue it doesn’t address is the amount of land and resources it will take. Although, it does not represent this topic it demonstrates how each part in the food system can be improved. This site demonstrates a variety of solutions on how to improve the food system we have today. This site establishes that there are ways to change the food system and that can create a more wholesome and healthier society.
Each of these arguments presented can only represent a glimpse at the errors and concerning facts about the current food system being used in today’s society. What the food industry does not want the consumer to know is that they actually have power in how the food industry can change. The consumer has the power to make purchases and to choose what type of production they support. As the consumer it is our job to purchase products that we can stand behind and be confident in saying I support the food I eat. By doing this the consumer can change the food market entirely, because the one thing that the system is focusing on is making a profit.
Reflection
1.) Describe your understanding of the “writer’s project”? How were you able to identify the texts’ “project”? Discuss your own “project” as it pertains to this particular blog article.
It is the ability to synthesize a text’s main concepts and values after reading it. After reading these texts, I searched for the key points and how the writer was presenting them. My project is to make people aware that there is not one simple solution to the food industry, but I want people to also know that they have the power to say what they will eat by choosing every time they go to the supermarket.
2.) Describe your completion of the “Sorting it Out” workshop? What sections were most beneficial to the development of your ideas—and why? Discuss how this workshop assisted in development of draft and/or assignment organization?
This work shop assisted me in determining the links between the different articles and how I could bring them all together. The most helpful part for me was when we had to identify key terms. After doing this I found different ways to combine the articles together. It helped me establish the main ideas I wanted to write about.
3.) Describe your understanding of synthesis. What is its importance? How did it manifest within your drafts and/or final blog article? Provide examples.
Synthesis is how someone determines how parts of the article relate to the world and impact other ideas in the article. It helps people focus on analyzing a text, rather that summarizing it. I was able to take key aspects of each article and relate them to one another. It helped me established an overarching theme for my article.
4.) Describe your own accomplishment (of something) during this unit.
I figured out how to focus more on synthesizing through the use of writers’ projects. Before when I tried to analyze I would mostly summarize, but now I feel as if I am looking more into the texts when I read them.
5.) Discuss the evolution of the main idea. Where did you begin (include the example) and show its progress (again, include example) throughout the drafting/revision process. To what do you attribute its evolution?
When I began I was going to focus on food borne illness. As I researched I realized that a better option would be organic vs. conventional production. Even as I was developing my argument I remained vague. After the “Developing a Claim” workshop I began to realize that I need to go more in depth to the issue. Then, I realized that I would rather let the person reading my article decide what type of food they would want to eat and to explain why the topic of food production is much more complicated than it often appears.
6.) Discuss what organizational strategies you implemented in order to structure this blog article. Provide examples from a section(s) of an earlier draft and other excerpts in later drafts to support your response.
I decided to start off easy and just demonstrate negative aspects of the food system and why people are concerned about it. Then, I decided to add another view towards the end to leave people thinking about why the food system is more complicated than it appears.
7.) Provide an example of the final draft where you successfully synthesize 3 texts in a concise and direct manner. Discuss how this evolved throughout the drafting process for you.
“One view which can be represented by sources such as Food Inc., “You are What They Eat”, and “Resisting Food Safety”. These articles offer that the word “sustainable” when being discussed with the current food system is based on creating food that will not demolish the societies overall health. This focuses in on the issues of administering drugs to meat, raising animals in warehouses, and using genetically modified plants.”
In this excerpt I demonstrate how all of these articles can relate to each other and I establish that they support the use of an organic style of production, or at least production that does not imply as many drugs.
8.) Discuss the evolution of the ‘lede’ in earlier drafts and its final version (provide examples of each): where did you begin, what feedback did you receive, and how did it end up in final blog article?
In my first draft it was vague, but after reading peer reviews I tried to elaborate more on the issues I am presenting.
9.) Name a specific writing/researching/revision goal you’d like to work on during the next Unit projects.
I would like to focus on producing a lede more, on how to be more articulate with writing details, and how to write in different styles.