Food safety is becoming a larger and larger issue every year as companies sacrifice safety for an increase in profits. The FDA and the government might seem like they are doing their job, but this is not the case as they are highly ineffective in making sure that the food that we eat is same to consume. If food safety is to become a lesser issue, there are going to need to be major changes made to the FDA and the other governmental agencies in charge. After reading the following articles and pieces of writing, “Resisting Food Safety“, “You are what they eat“, “Food Inc.”, “Organic Illusions,” and an outside news article. It is clear that this is a major issue that needs to have action taken in order to squash it.
In Marian Nestle’s “resisting food safety” the lack of organization and integration between the USDA, FDA and the government is exposed. “Any facility producing a food that involves both agencies must deal with inspectors operating under two entirely different sets of guidelines and schedules.” (Nestle, Page 57). The egg industry for example has three different agencies involved in regulations and food safety. This is an issue because they don’t work together making it harder for the company to please each of the agencies. It also makes it less efficient as they don’t work together and pool their resources together, instead they act completely independent of each other. Making their already small budget even less effective.
“You are what they eat” takes on a different approach by focusing on the issues with the feed supply and how little the government is doing about it. The FDA doesn’t seem to truly care if the acts that they put in to place, are actually followed. “Four years after the feed ban took effect, the FDA still had not acted promptly to compel firms to keep prohibited proteins out of cattle feed and to label animal feed that cannot be fed to cattle.” (You are what they eat, page 29). This just shows that the FDA put in place a policy and doesn’t even make sure the firms are following it. It seems like they made the act to please the public, yet don’t care about making sure the act is used to its full potential.
Marian Nestle further more extends this idea that the FDA does not go all the way with its policies. “The initial system worked well to keep sick animals out of the food supply but was poorly designed to deal with the challenges of microbes.” (Page 55). In this passage Nestle is talking about a policy that was put in place to make the feed safer for the final product. However, she points out that it might help some of the issues, but they completely ignored the issue of microbes. Which she argues is the main issue for food safety and the FDA needs to do more to control.
Blake Hurst’s “Organic Illusions,” focuses more on the false idea behind organic foods. His argument is that organic foods are not as safe as most people think. He even argues that they might be more dangerous and that the farming techniques are more impractical. “We don’t have enough land to turn our backs on the work of generations of agriculture scientists and industrial farmers, and we can’t afford the opportunity costs of a return to some romantic version of agriculture.” (Organic illusions). Basically saying that with the current demand it isn’t possible to produce enough food using organic methods, instead we have to keep “industrial” farming. But hopefully with better regulations that can improve food safety. Organic illusions also focuses on how Organic food isn’t the answer to safer and healthier food. This is an issue as the other texts offer organic food as the main way to avoid all of these food safety issues.
Next is Food Inc. which shows how big business is ruining farming and with it is producing more issues with food safety, while the FDA sits idly bye. The reason why they don’t intervene much is, as shown in Food Inc., most of the FDA has connections to a lot of these big meat packing businesses such as Tyson. A lot of the higher ups in the FDA has other motives when it comes to food safety. Often making decisions that benefit the big businesses rather then food safety as a whole.
Another trend that is seen in most of the sources, is that the FDA is severely under budgeted and doesn’t have the money to control all of the food that is consumed in the United States.“About 80 percent of seafood sold in the US is imported. Yet the FDA test only about 2 percent.” (You are what they eat, Page 30). This is just one example of how little the FDA is able to regulate compared to the huge quantity of food that is being produced as well as imported. The FDA only has 700 employees to regulate not only all food but meat poultry and eggs. They also regulate all drugs that are used in the United States. They are severely under manned in order to effectively regulate all of the markets they are responsible for. Due to this they only do inspections every one to five years. It is not frequent enough to squash the issue of food safety. The USDA does a better job as they have 7000 employees which allows them to inspect almost daily. (Nestle). Yet with the lack of solid policies even the USDA struggles as they regulate all meat after the slaughterhouse.
Luckily, the FDA is starting to notice these issues as well as the rise in food-borne related illnesses. “The eight per cent increase is due to a number of factors, including $268.7m in user fees for projects tied to a number of areas including the implementation of the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FMSA).” (Food Ingredients First). Although it might not be a huge overhaul, it is a step in the right direction. The proposed budget would be $5.1 billion for the period of October 2016 to September 2017, meaning that it would not have an impact for a decent amount of time. Just another reason why the FDA is struggling as everything moves on a very slow basis. They are always reacting to a problem rather then trying to prevent them from happening. The FDA and other government agencies responsible for food safety are constantly playing a game of catch up, and losing. Big business knows this and has the resources to exploit it. Food Safety wont begin to decline as an issue until the FDA and other government agencies begin to take charge and make changes before an issue arises.
Unfortunately, it is easier said then done. Although an increase in budget by a small percentage sounds good. It is nowhere near what they need. They are still severely under budgeted and understaffed to effectively prevent the issues of food safety. $5.1 billion dollars sounds like a lot of money, but as a percentage of how much the government spends it is next to nothing. Food-borne illnesses are becoming a huge problem in the United States as big outbreaks such as Chipotle are becoming more and more common. An issue as large as food safety, which is causing millions of illnesses and thousands of deaths, deserves a much larger budget in order to attack it in an effective manner. Yet the issue continues to grow and the FDA continues to sit idly by, just doing enough to satisfy most people, but not enough to actually tackle the issue.
Food Safety is a growing issue as more and more food becomes contaminated. Causing the amount of Americans getting food borne illnesses to rise, including the deadly ones such as e coli. The FDA and the other government agencies responsible must begin getting larger budgets as well as producing policies that can better regulate the food in America. The government needs to allocate some of its trillion dollar budget in order to tackle an issue that is increasing every year, and next to nothing is being done about. The FDA and other government agencies are slowly beginning to do a better job, but they still need to do a much better job.
- A writers project was something that I have never heard about before WRT 205. However, I believe I have a solid grasp on what it is. Basically it is the reason why a writer is writing something as well as their motives behind it. Googling the author and learning more about them almost always helped me recognize their project. In my case for this paper my project was to show the issues of food safety and more specifically the issues with the government and try and give example of how they could improve.
- The part that helped me out the most was the quotes and the arrows connecting them. This is because it helped me get direct evidence from the sources that were related to each other which made analyzing easier. It also helped me organize my paragraphs so they could flow better together.
- Synthesis is basically using multiple sources and finding parts where they connect with each other, whether they are agreeing with each other or not. My first draft was mostly just showing what each source said, as the drafts went on to my final paper I began to add analysis of their connections to each other.
- One main accomplishment that I had during this first unit was getting a great understanding of the issue of food safety and food borne illnesses. It was something that I had no knowledge of before and since then I have learned a significant amount about the topic and have a very good grasp of what is going on.
- My first main idea was just showing what the issue of food safety was and a little bit of background. I quickly realized that this was too broad and I needed to get more specific. I ultimately decided to focus on how little the FDA is doing about it and what they need to do in order to slow down the issue of food safety. I realized I needed to get more specific when it was tough to synthesize the sources as there wasn’t any specific argument to try to find in the sources.
- I decided to organize it by having a different main point in each paragraph and then adding a few sentences of synthesis. I did this from the beginning and thought it glowed nicely so I did not change it very must from the beginning. However one thing I added was the outside source at the end to provide additional evidence.
- “This is an issue as the other texts offer organic food as the main way to avoid all of these food safety issues.” Here I was talking about how Hurst’s article says that organic food isn’t as safe as we believe it is. All of the other sources name it as an alternative to big business food which has issues with food safety.
- Old:Food safety is becoming a larger and larger issue every year as company’s sacrifice safety for an increase in profits. The FDA and the government might seem like they are doing their job, but this is not the case as they are highly ineffective in making sure that the food that we eat is same to consume. If food safety is to become a lesser issue, there are going to need to be major changes made to the FDA and the other governmental agencies in charge.
New:Food safety is becoming a growing issue every year as large companies sacrifice cleanliness and health for profit. The FDA and government agencies responsible are under budgeted and under manned causing them to be highly ineffective in halting this issue of food safety.
The new one is much more concise and specific which was the issue with the first one and the feedback that I received on it.
- One thing I would like to work on for future projects is my ability to fluidly go from one point to another. I think although it isn’t terrible in this paper there is definitely a lot of room for improvement for future projects.